SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST vs CHIMICHANGAS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST: 6
vs
CHIMICHANGAS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST | CHIMICHANGAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 239 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 8.5 g | |
| Carbs | 11.4 g | 26.1 g | |
| Fat | 6.4 g | 10.6 g | |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 1.4 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST | CHIMICHANGAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4.3 MG | 3.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST | CHIMICHANGAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 70 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 150 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 336 MG | 373 MG |