SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST vs FARRO WITH CHOPPED BROCCOLI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST: 7
vs
FARRO WITH CHOPPED BROCCOLI: 3
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST | FARRO WITH CHOPPED BROCCOLI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 11.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 6.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST | FARRO WITH CHOPPED BROCCOLI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4.3 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLOW COOKED BEEF POT ROAST | FARRO WITH CHOPPED BROCCOLI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 150 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 336 MG | 0 MG |