SLIM JIM Gable Top Nacho vs Fully Cooked Bacon
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLIM JIM Gable Top Nacho wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SLIM JIM Gable Top Nacho: 4
vs
Fully Cooked Bacon: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLIM JIM Gable Top Nacho | Fully Cooked Bacon | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 25 g | 42.9 g | |
| Carbs | 12.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 37.5 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fiber | 12.5 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLIM JIM Gable Top Nacho | Fully Cooked Bacon | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLIM JIM Gable Top Nacho | Fully Cooked Bacon | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 438 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,688 MG | 2,143 MG |