SLICED COOKED HAM vs SCHALLER & WEBER TEAWURST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLICED COOKED HAM wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
SLICED COOKED HAM: 2
vs
SCHALLER & WEBER TEAWURST: 1
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLICED COOKED HAM | SCHALLER & WEBER TEAWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 17.9 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 39.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLICED COOKED HAM | SCHALLER & WEBER TEAWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLICED COOKED HAM | SCHALLER & WEBER TEAWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,000 MG | 1,071 MG |