SLAW DRESSING vs CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SLAW DRESSING: 1
vs
CAESAR DRESSING: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLAW DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 18.8 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 46.9 g | 43.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLAW DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLAW DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,094 MG | 1,067 MG |