SKINLESS SALMON FILLETS vs COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
SKINLESS SALMON FILLETS: 0
vs
COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP: 6
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS SALMON FILLETS | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 159 cal | 94 cal | |
| Protein | 20.4 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 8.0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS SALMON FILLETS | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS SALMON FILLETS | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 42 MG | 224 MG |