SKINLESS HADDOCK FILLETS vs TUNA POKE CUBES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
SKINLESS HADDOCK FILLETS: 3
vs
TUNA POKE CUBES: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS HADDOCK FILLETS | TUNA POKE CUBES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 23.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS HADDOCK FILLETS | TUNA POKE CUBES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS HADDOCK FILLETS | TUNA POKE CUBES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.2 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 286 MG | 442 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 214 MG | 44 MG |