SKINLESS CATFISH FILLETS vs WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SKINLESS CATFISH FILLETS: 2
vs
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS CATFISH FILLETS | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 86 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 19.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS CATFISH FILLETS | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS CATFISH FILLETS | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 132 MG |