SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK vs BAY SCALLOPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK: 4
vs
BAY SCALLOPS: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK | BAY SCALLOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 71 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 16.8 g | 12.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK | BAY SCALLOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK | BAY SCALLOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.3 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 212 MG | 142 MG |