SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT FLOUNDER vs BATTERED FISH PLANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BATTERED FISH PLANKS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT FLOUNDER: 4
vs
BATTERED FISH PLANKS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT FLOUNDER | BATTERED FISH PLANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 67 cal | 224 cal | |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 12.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 27.1 g | |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 9.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT FLOUNDER | BATTERED FISH PLANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT FLOUNDER | BATTERED FISH PLANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 22 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 156 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 117 MG | 471 MG |