SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT COD FILLETS vs WILD ALASKA POLLOCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD ALASKA POLLOCK wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT COD FILLETS: 2
vs
WILD ALASKA POLLOCK: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT COD FILLETS | WILD ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 59 cal | |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 11.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT COD FILLETS | WILD ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 8 MG | 15 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.2 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 239 MG | 160 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 119 MG | 329 MG |