SKINLESS BEEF FRANKS vs REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SKINLESS BEEF FRANKS: 2
vs
REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS BEEF FRANKS | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 208 cal | |
| Protein | 12 g | 16.7 g | |
| Carbs | 2 g | 6.3 g | |
| Fat | 30 g | 14.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS BEEF FRANKS | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 37.5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS BEEF FRANKS | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 2.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 979 MG |