SKINLESS BEEF FRANKS vs SCHALLER & WEBER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS BEEF FRANKS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SKINLESS BEEF FRANKS: 4
vs
SCHALLER & WEBER: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS BEEF FRANKS | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 320 cal | 389 cal | |
| Protein | 12 g | 10.2 g | |
| Carbs | 2 g | 1.9 g | |
| Fat | 30 g | 37.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS BEEF FRANKS | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS BEEF FRANKS | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 19 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,100 MG | 694 MG |