SIMPLY RANCH DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SIMPLY RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
SIMPLY RANCH DRESSING: 3
vs
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SIMPLY RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 517 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 40 g | 55.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SIMPLY RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SIMPLY RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 690 MG |