SIMPLY DRESSED DRESSING vs CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
SIMPLY DRESSED DRESSING: 0
vs
CAESAR DRESSING: 3
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SIMPLY DRESSED DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SIMPLY DRESSED DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SIMPLY DRESSED DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 767 MG | 867 MG |