SHRIMP 'N BATTER vs TAIL OFF COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL OFF COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SHRIMP 'N BATTER: 3
vs
TAIL OFF COOKED SHRIMP: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SHRIMP 'N BATTER | TAIL OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 259 cal | 59 cal | |
| Protein | 14.1 g | 14.1 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 21.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SHRIMP 'N BATTER | TAIL OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SHRIMP 'N BATTER | TAIL OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 47 MG | 94 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 812 MG | 353 MG |