SHRIMP COOKED vs HADDOCK BATTERED BITES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SHRIMP COOKED wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SHRIMP COOKED: 6
vs
HADDOCK BATTERED BITES: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SHRIMP COOKED | HADDOCK BATTERED BITES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 60 cal | 196 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 9.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 17.7 g | |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 9.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SHRIMP COOKED | HADDOCK BATTERED BITES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SHRIMP COOKED | HADDOCK BATTERED BITES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 48 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 157 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 440 MG | 343 MG |