SHRIMP vs PUBHOUSE BATTERED ALASKA COD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SHRIMP: 6
vs
PUBHOUSE BATTERED ALASKA COD: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SHRIMP | PUBHOUSE BATTERED ALASKA COD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 194 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 11.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 19.4 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 8.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SHRIMP | PUBHOUSE BATTERED ALASKA COD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SHRIMP | PUBHOUSE BATTERED ALASKA COD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 21 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 211 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 116 MG | 520 MG |