SHENANDOAH VALLEY vs CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
SHENANDOAH VALLEY: 2
vs
CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SHENANDOAH VALLEY | CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 567 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 60 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SHENANDOAH VALLEY | CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SHENANDOAH VALLEY | CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 733 MG | 867 MG |