SHAPE SUGAR COOKIES vs REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
SHAPE SUGAR COOKIES: 1
vs
REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SHAPE SUGAR COOKIES | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 423 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 61.5 g | 46.4 g | |
| Fat | 19.2 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SHAPE SUGAR COOKIES | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SHAPE SUGAR COOKIES | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 385 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 327 MG | 750 MG |