SHANKLESS BONELESS COOKED HAM vs CLASSIC BARBACOA BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SHANKLESS BONELESS COOKED HAM wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SHANKLESS BONELESS COOKED HAM: 4
vs
CLASSIC BARBACOA BEEF: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SHANKLESS BONELESS COOKED HAM | CLASSIC BARBACOA BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 212 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 12.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SHANKLESS BONELESS COOKED HAM | CLASSIC BARBACOA BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SHANKLESS BONELESS COOKED HAM | CLASSIC BARBACOA BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,196 MG | 482 MG |