SCONES vs REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SCONES wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SCONES: 4
vs
REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SCONES | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 368 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 15.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SCONES | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SCONES | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 53 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 316 MG | 0 MG |