SCHALLER & WEBER vs PORK TASSO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PORK TASSO wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
SCHALLER & WEBER: 0
vs
PORK TASSO: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SCHALLER & WEBER | PORK TASSO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 339 cal | 232 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 30.4 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SCHALLER & WEBER | PORK TASSO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SCHALLER & WEBER | PORK TASSO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 411 MG | 750 MG |