SANDING SUGAR vs FLAKED COCONUT
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FLAKED COCONUT wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SANDING SUGAR: 2
vs
FLAKED COCONUT: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SANDING SUGAR | FLAKED COCONUT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 100 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SANDING SUGAR | FLAKED COCONUT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SANDING SUGAR | FLAKED COCONUT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 233 MG |