SAKE COOKING WINE vs BALSAMIC GLAZE CLASSIC
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SAKE COOKING WINE wins in 3 out of 7 nutrient categories
SAKE COOKING WINE: 3
vs
BALSAMIC GLAZE CLASSIC: 0
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SAKE COOKING WINE | BALSAMIC GLAZE CLASSIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 83 cal | 200 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SAKE COOKING WINE | BALSAMIC GLAZE CLASSIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 533 MG | 67 MG |