ROLLED STYLE SUGAR CONES vs ANIMAL SHAPED BISCUITS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ANIMAL SHAPED BISCUITS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
ROLLED STYLE SUGAR CONES: 3
vs
ANIMAL SHAPED BISCUITS: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ROLLED STYLE SUGAR CONES | ANIMAL SHAPED BISCUITS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 409 cal | 520 cal | |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 8 g | |
| Carbs | 81.8 g | 64 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 24 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ROLLED STYLE SUGAR CONES | ANIMAL SHAPED BISCUITS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ROLLED STYLE SUGAR CONES | ANIMAL SHAPED BISCUITS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 240 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 182 MG | 420 MG |