RIVERTON VALLEY vs ORGANIC DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
RIVERTON VALLEY: 3
vs
ORGANIC DRESSING: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RIVERTON VALLEY | ORGANIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 117 cal | 167 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 23.3 g | 10 g | |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RIVERTON VALLEY | ORGANIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RIVERTON VALLEY | ORGANIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,033 MG | 800 MG |