RIVERTON VALLEY vs SALAD DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RIVERTON VALLEY wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
RIVERTON VALLEY: 3
vs
SALAD DRESSING: 2
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RIVERTON VALLEY | SALAD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 83 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 10 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RIVERTON VALLEY | SALAD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RIVERTON VALLEY | SALAD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 13 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,333 MG | 417 MG |