RINGS & TENTACLES SQUID vs SKINLESS BONELESS HADDOCK FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS BONELESS HADDOCK FILLETS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
RINGS & TENTACLES SQUID: 2
vs
SKINLESS BONELESS HADDOCK FILLETS: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RINGS & TENTACLES SQUID | SKINLESS BONELESS HADDOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 80 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 18.6 g | |
| Carbs | 2.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RINGS & TENTACLES SQUID | SKINLESS BONELESS HADDOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RINGS & TENTACLES SQUID | SKINLESS BONELESS HADDOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 31 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 250 MG | 407 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 45 MG | 75 MG |