RING KISHKA vs SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RING KISHKA wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
RING KISHKA: 7
vs
SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS: 1
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RING KISHKA | SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 268 cal | 316 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 8.8 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 8.8 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 28.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RING KISHKA | SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4.3 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | RING KISHKA | SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 70 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 9.6 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,321 MG | 1,193 MG |