RING CAKE vs ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
RING CAKE: 3
vs
ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RING CAKE | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 419 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 77.4 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 9.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RING CAKE | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 9.7 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 1.0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | RING CAKE | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 16 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 468 MG |