RING BOLOGNA vs UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
RING BOLOGNA: 3
vs
UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RING BOLOGNA | UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 268 cal | 109 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RING BOLOGNA | UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 42.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | RING BOLOGNA | UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 356 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,232 MG | 764 MG |