RICE COOKING WINE vs GLAZE ORGANIC SWEETER & THICKER BALSAMIC REDUCTION
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RICE COOKING WINE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
RICE COOKING WINE: 3
vs
GLAZE ORGANIC SWEETER & THICKER BALSAMIC REDUCTION: 0
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RICE COOKING WINE | GLAZE ORGANIC SWEETER & THICKER BALSAMIC REDUCTION | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 67 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 73.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RICE COOKING WINE | GLAZE ORGANIC SWEETER & THICKER BALSAMIC REDUCTION | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RICE COOKING WINE | GLAZE ORGANIC SWEETER & THICKER BALSAMIC REDUCTION | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 633 MG | 67 MG |