REDUCED SODIUM BEEF BASE vs CHILEPACIFIC
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHILEPACIFIC wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
REDUCED SODIUM BEEF BASE: 1
vs
CHILEPACIFIC: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED SODIUM BEEF BASE | CHILEPACIFIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 167 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 16.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED SODIUM BEEF BASE | CHILEPACIFIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED SODIUM BEEF BASE | CHILEPACIFIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 1,600 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 28.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 8,500 MG | 27,760 MG |