REDUCED FAT MILK vs SKIM MILK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKIM MILK wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT MILK: 0
vs
SKIM MILK: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT MILK | SKIM MILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 92 cal | 38 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 15.4 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED FAT MILK | SKIM MILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT MILK | SKIM MILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 125 MG | 125 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 44 MG | 54 MG |