REDUCED FAT MILK vs 100% WHOLE MILK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
100% WHOLE MILK wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT MILK: 3
vs
100% WHOLE MILK: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT MILK | 100% WHOLE MILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 54 cal | 85 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.4 g | |
| Carbs | 5 g | 11.4 g | |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 3.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED FAT MILK | 100% WHOLE MILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT MILK | 100% WHOLE MILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 125 MG | 127 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 117 MG | 326 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 54 MG | 85 MG |