REDUCED FAT MAYO DRESSING vs ORGANIC CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORGANIC CAESAR DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT MAYO DRESSING: 2
vs
ORGANIC CAESAR DRESSING: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT MAYO DRESSING | ORGANIC CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 233 cal | 367 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 23.3 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED FAT MAYO DRESSING | ORGANIC CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT MAYO DRESSING | ORGANIC CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 97 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 53 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 700 MG | 833 MG |