REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS vs APPLE STRUDEL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
APPLE STRUDEL wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS: 3
vs
APPLE STRUDEL: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | APPLE STRUDEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 357 cal | 352 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 5.6 g | |
| Carbs | 42.9 g | 46.5 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 15.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | APPLE STRUDEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | APPLE STRUDEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 2.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 821 MG | 197 MG |