REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS vs GRAHAM CRACKER PIE CRUST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS: 6
vs
GRAHAM CRACKER PIE CRUST: 1
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | GRAHAM CRACKER PIE CRUST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 476 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 4.8 g | |
| Carbs | 46.4 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fat | 10.7 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 4.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | GRAHAM CRACKER PIE CRUST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 750 MG | 476 MG |