REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS vs HANNAFORD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS: 5
vs
HANNAFORD: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | HANNAFORD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 357 cal | 524 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 4.8 g | |
| Carbs | 42.9 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | HANNAFORD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | HANNAFORD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 821 MG | 333 MG |