REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS vs HOT LINKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS: 6
vs
HOT LINKS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 208 cal | 262 cal | |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 13.1 g | |
| Carbs | 6.3 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 14.6 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 37.5 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 979 MG | 1,036 MG |