REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS vs CHICKEN SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN SAUSAGE wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS: 3
vs
CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 208 cal | 156 cal | |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 18.2 g | |
| Carbs | 6.3 g | 3.9 g | |
| Fat | 14.6 g | 7.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 37.5 MG | 1.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 26 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 979 MG | 714 MG |