REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS vs CHICKEN SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 12 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS: 4
vs
CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 188 cal | 140 cal | |
| Protein | 14.6 g | 17.5 g | |
| Carbs | 2.1 g | 7.0 g | |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 12 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 219 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 625 MG | 737 MG |