RED WINE SWEET ITALIAN vs SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
RED WINE SWEET ITALIAN: 2
vs
SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING: 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED WINE SWEET ITALIAN | SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 35.7 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 32.1 g | 43.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED WINE SWEET ITALIAN | SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 33 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 33 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 482 MG | 700 MG |