RED WINE BALSAMIC DRESSING vs CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RED WINE BALSAMIC DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
RED WINE BALSAMIC DRESSING: 3
vs
CAESAR DRESSING: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED WINE BALSAMIC DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 290 cal | 357 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 12.9 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 25.8 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED WINE BALSAMIC DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 839 MG | 393 MG |