RED WINE BALSAMIC DRESSING vs SUGAR FREE RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SUGAR FREE RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
RED WINE BALSAMIC DRESSING: 0
vs
SUGAR FREE RANCH DRESSING: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED WINE BALSAMIC DRESSING | SUGAR FREE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 290 cal | 117 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 12.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 25.8 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RED WINE BALSAMIC DRESSING | SUGAR FREE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED WINE BALSAMIC DRESSING | SUGAR FREE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 839 MG | 900 MG |