RED SILK BEANS vs WAKAME
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WAKAME wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
RED SILK BEANS: 3
vs
WAKAME: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED SILK BEANS | WAKAME | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 139 cal | 257 cal | |
| Protein | 22.2 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 63.9 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 44.4 g | 14.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RED SILK BEANS | WAKAME | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 34.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED SILK BEANS | WAKAME | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 167 MG | 1,429 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 7.5 MG | 15.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 69 MG | 1,129 MG |