RED ICING vs ALMOND BARK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALMOND BARK wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
RED ICING: 2
vs
ALMOND BARK: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED ICING | ALMOND BARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 532 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.1 g | |
| Carbs | 71.4 g | 68.1 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 29.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RED ICING | ALMOND BARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED ICING | ALMOND BARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |