RED HOT LINKS vs SCHALLER & WEBER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SCHALLER & WEBER wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
RED HOT LINKS: 3
vs
SCHALLER & WEBER: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED HOT LINKS | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 122 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 18.9 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 3.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RED HOT LINKS | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED HOT LINKS | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 22 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,607 MG | 711 MG |