RED DECORATING ICING vs RED SUGAR CRYSTALS EDIBLE DECOR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RED DECORATING ICING wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
RED DECORATING ICING: 2
vs
RED SUGAR CRYSTALS EDIBLE DECOR: 1
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED DECORATING ICING | RED SUGAR CRYSTALS EDIBLE DECOR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 417 cal | 417 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 100 g | |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RED DECORATING ICING | RED SUGAR CRYSTALS EDIBLE DECOR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED DECORATING ICING | RED SUGAR CRYSTALS EDIBLE DECOR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 167 MG | 0 MG |